Myopia Profile

Clinical

Myopia and exotropia – what’s the connection?

Posted on February 12th 2019 by Kate Gifford

In this article:

First published February 12, 2019
Updated October 31, 2025

This article explores the relationship between exotropia and myopia, how different optical corrections can alter binocular vision, and what this means for prescribing decisions.

Through two case studies, learn how to approach prescribing for myopic children with exophoria – from choosing the most suitable correction, maintaining fusion stability, and achieving effective myopia control. 


How is exotropia linked to myopia?

Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is characterised by an intermittent outward deviation of one or both eyes. It is the most common type of strabismus in childhood, occurring in approximately 1% of healthy children in the US and more prominently in Asia, at 0.62-4.7%.1-3

Myopia commonly presents with exotropia as a co-morbidity, as IXT has been associated with myopia onset. The prevalence of myopia is higher in children with exotropia than children without strabismus, as seen in 12-year-old Australian children (57% vs 12%) and in children up to 6 years old in the US (12% vs 4%).4,5 A population-based study noted that almost 47% of children with IXT had developed myopia by age 10, and over 90% by age 20.6

On the other hand, the relationship between exotropia and myopia progression (among myopic children) is not as well established. One recent study suggests that there is no difference in natural myopia progression among children with IXT and those without strabismus.7 Interestingly, undergoing corrective strabismus surgery does not have any impact on a child’s rate of myopia progression.6,7

While evidence suggests that children with IXT are more likely to develop myopia, once myopic, they do not appear to experience faster progression than their peers.

Which comes first: myopia or exotropia?

It is unknown whether myopia development or progression could trigger IXT, or whether the reverse is true. 

If myopia comes first, then myopia lends to lower accommodative demand, resulting in reduced convergence. For predisposed individuals, this may cause decompensation into significant exophoria or IXT. 

If the IXT comes first, then the increased accommodative demand to maintain accurate near point focus could lead to pseudo-myopia at distance, and drive myopia progression. If this is the case, then correcting IXT may slow the progression of myopia (or vice-versa). However – as previously mentioned, surgical correction of IXT was found to have no effect on myopia progression in multiple studies.6,7

Disrupted fusion from anisometropic myopia in early childhood can lead to exotropia. The reverse can also occur – suppression from exotropia can cause sensory strabismus and form deprivation myopia.8

How optical correction affects binocular vision

For every child, choosing between spectacles and contact lenses does more than correct myopia – it can also affect their binocular vision function.

BV specs to CLs exo myope.png

A myopic individual who reads through glasses experiences base-in prism at near, moving the image further away. Looking away from the optical centre of the lens also reduces the power, effectively reducing the accommodative demand. 

When switched to a single vision contact lens, they must increase their accommodative effort, and they will also show an exophoric shift (as the base-in effect is lost) and have to converge more by themselves.9

Shifting from spectacles to LASIK correction in young adults has also been associated with exophoric shifts.10

Compared to spectacles, myopic children wearing contact lenses face higher accommodative demand and an exophoric shift, whereas hyperopes experience reduced demand and an esophoric shift.

Case study 1 – Ajay's story

Ajay was referred for orthokeratology (OK) at age 11, after his myopia progressed by R -0.75 and L -2.50 over one year. Initially at age 10, his spectacle refraction was R-2.00/-0.75x90 and L -2.50/-1.25x90. On examination, I noted that Ajay exhibited a left eye almost-constant convergence insufficiency exotropia (near worse than distance). 

For Ajay, shifting from a spectacle correction where an IXT – which was nearly constant – could lead to decompensation into a constant exotropia. Despite being referred for OK fitting, Ajay's binocular vision status made him an unsuitable candidate. Thus, it was planned for Ajay to continue wearing glasses for the next year – with prism correction to help fusion, along with vision training to improve his binocularity. 

While a -0.50 shift in both R&L eyes has occurred over the subsequent year, this is significantly less than the previous year. Additionally, the sensory component of Ajay's strabismus has improved. In time, he may be suitable to be fit with OK or alternatively a myopia control soft contact lens.

Information

Essilor Stellest lenses have also been shown NOT to disrupt binocular vision or accommodation in children with IXT - and can therefore be considered a safe and effective option for myopia management.

Case study 2 – Mary's story

Mary had unfortunately progressed to high anisometropic myopia by the time I first saw her at age 11. She had a similar binocular vision status to Ajay with left IXT, though not as severe as Ajay. 

Because she was very motivated to wear contact lenses, she was initially fit with OK correction. Full correction was achieved in her right eye and a -1.75DS residual occurred in her L eye. I was satisfied with this outcome, as studies have shown that partial correction of high myopia can achieve a similar myopia control effect to full correction.11 Mary also needed to wear glasses anyway, as base-in prism was prescribed to improve fusion.

After one year, Mary's myopia in her right eye stable – but her left eye had progressed by -1.50DS. A terrible outcome! What has occurred?

It turned out that having her right eye fully corrected by OK had disincentivized her to wear glasses. As a result, her left eye had spent a significant time undercorrected, which is known to increase myopia progression.12 Poor compliance with her glasses also led to more inconsistent binocular fusion. Overall, the left eye had suffered a double whammy of undercorrection and intermittent suppression. 

Mary was discontinued from OK and fit into full correction, centre-distance toric multifocal soft contact lenses with +2.50 add. She has since worn these successfully for over a year now, with stable myopia. Vision training was provided to improve her binocular stability and base-out (convergent) fusional reserves, as her IXT needed to be reduced for her to continue wearing contact lenses.

Partial correction of high myopia with OK is a potential strategy for myopia control. 

In this case however, a fully-corrected dominant eye discouraged spectacle wear, leaving the fellow eye under-corrected and more prone to suppression.

Key points

  • Intermittent exotropia can increase the risk of developing myopia, but once myopic, the rate of myopia progression is comparable to peers without strabismus.
  • Switching a myopic child from spectacles to contact lenses often increases accommodative demand and produces an exophoric shift, which can potentially destabilize binocular fusion.
  • Assess binocular vision in individuals with myopia, and consider binocular vision status when tailoring treatments. 

Want to learn more about binocular vision?

Discover our Binocular Vision Fundamentals online course – designed to build your confidence and clinical precision in assessing and managing BV. 

You’ll learn our practical two-system approach to accommodation and vergence, step through key diagnostic tests, and refine your prescribing and management decisions. The course also explores how to communicate BV findings with patients and why BV is essential in myopia management – always with a sharp focus on clinical application.

Enjoy video demonstrations, real-world case examples, and downloadable chairside infographics you can use immediately in practice. 


Meet the Authors:

About Kate Gifford

Dr Kate Gifford is an internationally renowned clinician-scientist optometrist and peer educator, and a Visiting Research Fellow at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. She holds a PhD in contact lens optics in myopia, four professional fellowships, over 100 peer reviewed and professional publications, and has presented more than 200 conference lectures. Kate is the Chair of the Clinical Management Guidelines Committee of the International Myopia Institute. In 2016 Kate co-founded Myopia Profile with Dr Paul Gifford; the world-leading educational platform on childhood myopia management. After 13 years of clinical practice ownership, Kate now works full time on Myopia Profile.

Back to all articles

Enormous thanks to our visionary sponsors

Myopia Profile’s growth into a world leading platform has been made possible through the support of our visionary sponsors, who share our mission to improve children’s vision care worldwide. Click on their logos to learn about how these companies are innovating and developing resources with us to support you in managing your patients with myopia.