Clinical
How to measure fusional reserves in clinical practice
In this article:
First published September 22, 2017
Updated July 8, 2026
Fusional reserves are an objective measure of your patient’s ability to compensate for a phoria, and are straightforward to assess using a prism bar. This article explains the purpose of assessing fusional reserves, how to test fusional reserves in the clinic, and how to interpret the results.
Importance of fusional reserves
Understanding the dynamics of fusional vergence is an important part of optometric testing. The fusional reserves – the range or amplitude of fusional vergence, indicates the vergence system’s ability to maintain binocular vision.
Heterophorias represent the underlying tendency for the eyes to misalign when they are dissociated, for example when one eye is covered. A person must apply enough motor fusion to overcome this misalignment and restore the correct balance between convergence and divergence. Large phorias come with high vergence demand, and correspondingly, higher fusional reserves are needed to keep this balance in check.
If the degree of fusion is not enough to compensate for the phoria, it may result in decompensation, and lead to asthenopia, blur, diplopia, and sometimes suppression. Moreover, patients with intermittent deviations are likely to be near their motor fusion threshold and identifying their reserves provides valuable information.
Fusional reserves can be thought of as the ‘muscles’ to correct back posture. A person with poor back posture (e.g. large exophoria) may cope well if they have strong muscles to correct it (high base-out fusional reserves).
Where binocular vision fits in myopia management
Binocular vision anomalies have been associated with higher risk of developing myopia. Children with higher accommodative convergence (AC/A) ratios, typically seen with esophoria, have over 20-fold increased risk of myopia development within one year.
Binocular vision disorders can have a significant impact on visual comfort. Reading, learning, other near visual tasks require comfortable, functional vision. If abnormal binocular vision is unaddressed, this may affect a child’s quality of life, psychological wellbeing, and potentially their academic achievement.
Binocular vision status can influence prescribing choices too. Some myopia control modalities, like orthokeratology, have been shown to alter binocular vision parameters. For example, esophoria and accommodative lag are likely to be improved in orthokeratology wear.
Binocular vision assessment contributes an important layer to clinical decision making in myopia management.
What equipment do I need?
Fusional reserves can be directly measured using either smooth or step (jump) vergence testing.
Whereas smooth vergences involve a gradual, continuous increase in prism, step vergences introduce prismatic demand in larger, discrete steps.
Here's my loving my prism bar and fixation stick, “Mr Camel”.
Step vergence testing is performed outside the phoropter using a horizontal prism bar. This method allows you to observe objective fusion in free space, making it a practical technique with young patients or verbally uncooperative patients.(13) Otherwise, smooth vergence testing can be performed using the rotary prism in the phoropter.
A small, detailed fixation target at near is also required. A picture stick or similar target with fine detail works well, as it provides a clear stimulus for fusion and is engaging for younger patients.
Australian stockists of horizontal prism bars and fixation targets include Optimed, ParagonCare, and the Australiasian College of Behavioural Optometrists (ACBO).
How to measure horizontal fusional reserves
Positive (base-out) and negative (base-in) fusional reserves are measures of the amount of prism that can be placed in front of the eyes before the patients begins to experience sustained blur. Past this point, the patient will begin to use accommodative vergence alongside fusional vergence to maintain single binocular vision.
It is recommended to start with measuring the heterophoria, then testing negative fusional vergence (NFV) in the relaxed state, followed by positive fusional vergence (PFV). This helps prevent the impact of vergence adaptation on subsequent findings.
Steps:
- Start by holding the prism bar in your right hand, and the fixation target in the left. This results in the prism bar being held in front of the patient’s left eye.
- Measure NFV (base-in fusional reserves) with one of two methods:
- Jump vergence: increase the prism demand step by step by moving the prism bar upwards, asking the patient at each step whether the target appears single or double.
- Jump facility vergence: hold the prism bar at a given prism step, watch for fusion, then remove the prism to allow recovery, then advance to the next step and repeat.
- Increase the prism demand until the patient reports diplopia or until wobbly, horizontal eye movements are seen – this is the break point. Patients may not spontaneously report diplopia, so objective observation is important.
- Reduce the prism demand until single vision is restored – this is the recovery point.
- The blur point (when the target first becomes unclear) can also be recorded, though this is less reliable in younger children and accommodation testing can provide complementary information.
- Record results as break/recovery or blur/break/recovery.
- To test PFV (base-out fusional reserves), swap the prism bar to your left hand and the fixation target to your right. Repeat steps 1–6.
If a cover test is performed between each component of testing (NFV – cover test – PFV – cover test – NFV – final cover test), this sequence helps detect changes heterophoria and fusional reserves after fatigue. For example, if the patient becomes more esophoric after PFV, this suggests that they may struggle with fatigue throughout a day at school or work.
Want to see how it’s done? Watch this technique in action.
When to modify the approach
The standard assessment sequence of NFV (divergence), PFV (convergence), NFV (divergence) is appropriate in most cases.
However, if a large exophoria has already been identified on phoria measurement (e.g. cover test), begin with PFV (base-out fusional reserve) instead. Diverging the eyes even further before assessing convergence range is of limited value, as the priority is to see how well the patient can overcome their exophoric deviation.
- In this case, start with the prism bar held over the patient's right eye, measure base-out prism range, then move to base-in over their left eye. If both NFV and PFV are reduced, consider vergence infacility as a differential rather than a basic phoria finding.
Interpreting the results
Sheard's criterion specifies that for sustained comfort, the fusional reserves should be at least twice the demand (i.e. the heterophoria).
- A patient with esophoria requires NFV (base-in fusional reserve) of at least twice the esophoria magnitude.
- A patient with exophoria requires PFV (base-out fusional reserve) of at least twice the esophoria magnitude.
From the myopia management point of view, NFV (base-in fusional reserves) are of particular interest. Given the established link between esophoria and myopia risk, having enough base-in fusional reserve is important to balance any esophoria present.
Keep in mind, though, a patient may satisfy Sheard's criterion and still have binocular instability or vergence infacility, if the overall fusional reserve values are low.
Key points
- Assessing fusional reserves in addition to heterophoria provides a more complete picture of binocular stability than either measurement alone.
- The most practical way to measure fusional reserves is through step vergences using a prism bar. This allows you to observe the patient’s eyes for break in fusion and recovery, rather than relying on subjective reporting.
- Apply Sheard's criterion to interpret results – opposing fusional reserves should be at least twice the phoria magnitude.
Want to learn more about binocular vision?
Discover our Binocular Vision Fundamentals online course – designed to build your confidence and clinical precision in assessing and managing BV.
You’ll learn our practical two-system approach to accommodation and vergence, step through key diagnostic tests, and refine your prescribing and management decisions. The course also explores how to communicate BV findings with patients and why BV is essential in myopia management – always with a sharp focus on clinical application.
Enjoy video demonstrations, real-world case examples, and downloadable chairside infographics you can use immediately in practice.
Meet the Authors:
About Kate Gifford
Dr Kate Gifford is an internationally renowned clinician-scientist optometrist and peer educator, and a Visiting Research Fellow at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. She holds a PhD in contact lens optics in myopia, four professional fellowships, over 100 peer reviewed and professional publications, and has presented almost 300 conference lectures around the world. Kate is the Chair of the Clinical Management Guidelines Committee of the International Myopia Institute. In 2016 Kate co-founded Myopia Profile with Dr Paul Gifford; the world-leading educational platform on childhood myopia management. After 13 years of clinical practice ownership, Kate now works full time on Myopia Profile.
References
Arnoldi K. Orthoptic Evaluation and Treatment. In: Pediatric Ophthalmology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 113–40.
- Mutti DO, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, et al. AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Aug 2000;41(9):2469-78. [link]
- Allen PM, O'Leary DJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. Feb 2006;46(4):491-505. [link]
- Ekdawi NS, Nusz KJ, Diehl NN, et al. The development of myopia among children with intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. Mar 2010;149(3):503-7. [link]
- Shin HS, Park SC, Park CM. Relationship between accommodative and vergence dysfunctions and academic achievement for primary school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. Nov 2009;29(6):615-24. [link]
- Gifford K, Gifford P, Hendicott PL, et al. Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. Jun 2017;40(3):184-189. [link]
- Gifford KL, Gifford P, Hendicott PL, et al. Zone of Clear Single Binocular Vision in Myopic Orthokeratology. Eye Contact Lens. Mar 2020;46(2):82-90. [link]
- Ruiz-Pomeda A, Pérez-Sánchez B, Cañadas P, et al. Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Jan 2019;257(1):207-215. [link]
- Lam CSY, Tang WC, Tse DY, et al. Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses slow myopia progression: a 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. Mar 2020;104(3):363-368. [link]
- Bao J, Yang A, Huang Y, et al. One-year myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets. Br J Ophthalmol. Aug 2022;106(8):1171-1176. [link]
- Lança CC, Rowe FJ. Measurement of fusional vergence: a systematic review. Strabismus. Jun 2019;27(2):88-113. [link]
- Goss DA, Becker E. Comparison of near fusional vergence ranges with rotary prisms and with prism bars. Optometry. Feb 2011;82(2):104-7. [link]
Cooper JS, Burns CR, Cotter SA, Daum KM, Griffin JR, Scheiman MM. Optometric clinical practice guideline care of the patient with accommodative and vergence dysfunction [Internet]. American Optometric Association; 2010. Available from: https://www.aoa.org/AOA/Documents/Practice%20Management/Clinical%20Guidelines/Consensus-based%20guidelines/Care%20of%20Patient%20with%20Accommodative%20and%20Vergence%20Dysfunction.pdf
[link]- Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ, Wong ES, et al. Vergence adaptation and the order of clinical vergence range testing. Optom Vis Sci. Apr 1995;72(4):219-23. [link]
Sheard C. Zones of ocular comfort. Optom Vis Sci. 1930 Jan;7(1):9–25.
Enormous thanks to our visionary sponsors
Myopia Profile’s growth into a world leading platform has been made possible through the support of our visionary sponsors, who share our mission to improve children’s vision care worldwide. Click on their logos to learn about how these companies are innovating and developing resources with us to support you in managing your patients with myopia.